Rashid

Gilbert v. Rashid

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20231:22-cv-00674California4,398 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 DARREN GILBERT, Case No. 1:22-cv-00674-ADA-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT1 HAROON AL RASHID, individually and OBJECTIONS DUE IN FOURTEEN DAYS dba RAHMAN GAS AND MARKET aka TRIPLE R GASOLINE (Doc. No. 9) Defendants. 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). (Doc. No. 9, “Motion”). The Defendant has not answered nor responded to the Complaint. Nor have Defendant filed any opposition or taken any actions in this case. The Court found the Motion suitable for disposition without oral argument under Civil Local Rule 230(g) and vacated the hearing scheduled for February 8, 2023. (Doc. No. 10). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends the district court grant in part Plaintiff’s Motion. I. BACKGROUND On June 3,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.