Berumen

(PC) Brown v. Berumen

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20232:21-cv-02187California351 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JONATHAN Q. BROWN, No. 2:21-cv-02187 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

S. BERUMEN, et al., Defendants. 15 On August 10, 2023, plaintiff was ordered to show cause in writing, within twenty-one days, why this matter should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 26. In the alternative, plaintiff was given the option to file a response to defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Id. at 2. More than twenty-one days have passed, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order in any way. Therefore, it will be recommended that this matter be dismissed. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall randomly assign a District Judge to this action. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to obey a court order and for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). //// //// ] …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.