Strancener

(PC) Van den Heuvel v. Strancener

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20232:23-cv-00278California424 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN MARK VAN DEN HEUVEL, No. 2:23-cv-0278 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

WARREN C. STRANCENER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former1 county inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order dated July 27, 2023, the undersigned dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff was given thirty days leave to file an amended complaint and warned that failure to comply would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id.) Those thirty days have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, sought additional time to file an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, the undersigned will recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. //// 26 1 At the time plaintiff filed the complaint he was in the custody of El…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.