Babu

(PC) Jackson v. Babu

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20232:23-cv-00034California432 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES ESCO JACKSON, No. 2:23-cv-0034 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

VEER BABU et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. On June 8, 2023, the court dismissed plaintiff’s first amended complaint (ECF No. 11) for failure to state a claim and granted plaintiff thirty days to file a second amended complaint. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff did not file a second amended complaint or otherwise respond to the court’s order. On July 27, 2023, the court issued an order directing plaintiff to file a second amended complaint or show cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff was granted thirty days to respond to the order and warned that failure to comply would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id.) Those thirty days have passed, and plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.