(PC) Spence v. Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20232:21-cv-00692California1,658 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GERALD SPENCE, No. 2:21-cv-0692 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER B. JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 52. Plaintiff submitted a statement of non-opposition to defendants’ motion. ECF No. 55. In addition, several previous motions filed by both parties are also pending. ECF Nos. 40, 42, 43, 51. The court will address the parties’ outstanding motions in this order. In addition, plaintiff will be ordered to inform the court if he would like his statement of non-opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment to stand. I. BACKGROUND This matter is at the pretrial motion stage of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.