(PC) Foster v. Clark
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 MICHAEL FOSTER, No. 1:22-cv-00976-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE
v. TO THIS ACTION KEN CLARK, et al.,, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF
Defendants. DEFENDANT WARDEN CLARK (ECF Nos. 53, 56) 15 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the instant action on August 1, 2022. On September 2, 2022, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, found he failed to state any cognizable claims, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint on September 20, 2022. (ECF No. 13.) On September 30, 2022, the Court found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim against Defendant Romero for failure to protect in violation of the…