(PC) Edwards v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20232:22-cv-01854California4,503 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY D. EDWARDS, No. 2:22-cv-1854 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that he was denied adequate medical care. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint (ECF No. 15) and second amended complaint for screening (ECF No. 16). For the reasons set forth below, the court will grant the motion to amend and dismiss the complaint with leave to amend. MOTION TO AMEND Plaintiff states he is seeking leave to file an amended complaint to “correct and eliminate a duplicative filing in this case” and because he “erroneously filed an amended pleading with exhibits and referred to the original complaint in an effort” to state a claim. (ECF No. 15 at 2.) He states that he is seeking leave to amend to consolidate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.