(PS) Hedrington v. David Grant Medical Center

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20232:23-cv-00801California644 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ORLONZO HEDRINGTON, No. 2:23-cv-0801-TLN-CKD (PS) Plaintiffs, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO SERVE

DAVID GRANT MEDICAL CENTER, et al., 15 Defendants.

Proceeding without the assistance of counsel, plaintiff filed this action on April 27, 2023.1 On April 28, 2023, plaintiff was issued summons by the Clerk of Court to serve the defendants. On August 18, 2023, the court filed an order informing plaintiff that, pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a defendant must be dismissed if service of the summons and complaint is not accomplished on the defendant within 90 days after the complaint was filed. (ECF No. 18.) Plaintiff was ordered to show cause in writing within 14 days as to why defendant City of Fairfield Police Department should not be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to comply with Rule 4 as to defendant Fairfield Police Department. Plaintiff has not filed any response to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.