Jalijali

(PC) Williams v. Jalijali

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20232:22-cv-00605California559 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LANCE E. WILLIAMS, No. 2:22-cv-00605-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER JEHOSHUA JALIJALI, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 25, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, ECF No. 38, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff objects in part to the findings and recommendations and asks the court not to revoke his in forma pauperis status. ECF No. 39. In response, defendants ask the court to disregard plaintiff’s objection as late and unsupported by argument or legal authority. ECF No. 40. The court considers both 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.