(SS) Landgren v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20231:23-cv-01347California1,500 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDREW LANDGREN, Case No. 1:23-cv-01347-CDB (SS)

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

v. (Docs. 1, 2) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

Defendant.

16 17 On September 12, 2023, Plaintiff Andrew Landgren (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed the complaint in this action. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee and instead filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2). While Plaintiff’s application demonstrates that he may be financially eligible to proceed without prepayment of fees in this action, the Court screened the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and finds that Plaintiff’s complain fails to state a claim. Accordingly, the Court will order Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint before proceeding in this action without the prepayment of fees. I. Proceeding in forma pauperis The Court may authorize the commencement of an action without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.