(SS) Daniel v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20231:22-cv-01094California7,672 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES PAUL DANIEL, Case No. 1:22-cv-01094-BAM Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

14 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner (Doc. 21) of Social Security, Defendant. 17

INTRODUCTION Plaintiff James Paul Daniel (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. The parties’ briefing on the motion was submitted, without oral argument, to Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Docs. 21, 25.)1 Having considered the parties’ briefs, along with the entire record in this case, the Court finds that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) is supported by substantial evidence in the 26 27 1 The parties consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.