Sacramento Homeless Union v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20232:22-cv-01095California1,509 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO HOMELESS UNION, et No. 2:22-cv-01095-TLN-KJN al., 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Sacramento Homeless Union, Betty Rios, Donta Williams, and Falisha Scott’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion to Extend and Enlarge the Court’s Injunction. (ECF No. 66.) The City filed an opposition. (ECF No. 68.) Plaintiffs filed a reply. (ECF No. 73.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND A full recitation of the background of this case is unnecessary as it is set forth fully in the Court’s prior orders. (ECF Nos. 22, 55.) Most recently, on August 16, 2023, the Court extended an injunction prohibiting the City from clearing homeless encampments based on the excessive heat forecasted for the month of August. (ECF No. 55.) The Court indicated the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.