Ali
(PC) Williams v. Ali
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT CURTIS WILLIAMS, III, No. 2:21-cv-01877-DAD-CKD (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING THE PENDING
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN
v. PART AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
M. ALI, (Doc. Nos. 33, 36) Defendant.
17 Plaintiff Robert Curtis Williams, III is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 5, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 33) be denied to the extent it was based upon plaintiff’s purported failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit but granted to the extent the motion was based upon defendant Dr. Ali’s contention that he was not working at the institution in question…