Dahl
(PC) Adams v. Dahl
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL ADAMS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00852-JLT-CDB (PC)
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
TO DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO
v. COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER
DAHL, et al., (Docs. 59, 61)
Defendants.
FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE
16 Plaintiff Paul Adams is a parolee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant E. Kendrick propounded a request for production of documents supporting Plaintiff’s contention that he exhausted available administrative remedies before filing this civil action. (Doc. 57-2.) Plaintiff failed to respond to the request. Therefore, Defendants filed a motion to compel a response to their discovery request pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 57) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1)). After Plaintiff failed to respond to the motion, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file one of the…