Hendrix

Hendrix v. City of Madera

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20231:23-cv-01212California3,418 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ALEXANDER C. HENDRIX, Case No. 1:23-cv-01212-JLT-BAM Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO

v. STATE A CLAIM CITY OF MADERA, et al., (Doc. 5) Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 15 Plaintiff Alexander C. Hendrix (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this action on August 24, 2023. (Doc. 1.) The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, and Plaintiff was granted leave to amend. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint is currently before the Court for screening. (Doc. 5.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court screens complaints brought by persons proceeding in pro se and in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or if it seeks monetary relief from a defendant who…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.