Moreno

(PC) Mckenzie v. Moreno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20231:23-cv-01071California418 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 JAMAL DELANO MCKENZIE, 1:23-cv-01071-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

CARISSA MORENO, et al. RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN (14) DAYS

17 Plaintiff Jamal Delano McKenzie is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights 18 lawsuit filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. After Plaintiff failed to submit an application to 19 proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee, the Court issued an order on July 19, 2023, giving 20 Plaintiff forty-five days to do either and warning of dismissal if Plaintiff failed to comply. (ECF 21 No. 4). The forty-five-day period has expired, and Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee, submit 22 an IFP application, or otherwise respond to the Court’s order. 23 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall assign a district judge to this 24 case. 25 And IT IS…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.