Jennings

(PC) Bland v. Jennings

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20232:20-cv-01165California1,217 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA DAVIS BLAND, No. 2:20-cv-01165-DAD-DMC (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

PIERSON, et al., (Doc. Nos. 28, 35, 40, 41, 47, 63, 65, 69, 86, Defendants. 88) 16 Plaintiff Joshua Davis Bland is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 25, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 63) be granted, that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 47) be denied, and that all remaining pending motions and requests (Doc. Nos. 28, 35, 40, 41, 65, 69, 86) be denied as having been rendered moot. (Doc. No. 88.) Specifically, the magistrate judge concluded that defendants are entitled to summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.