Warden

(HC) Tumbaco v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20232:23-cv-01144California331 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CALIXTO TUMBACO, No. 2:23-cv-1144 TLN CKD P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS WARDEN, F.C.I. HERLONG, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se. On August 13, 2023, petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus was dismissed with leave to amend. Petitioner was granted 30 days to file an amended petition and was warned that failure to file an amended petition would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Petitioner has not filed an amended petition. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the court’s August 13, 2023 order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.