(SS) Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20232:21-cv-00412California4,033 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON BRIAN SMITH, No. 2:21-cv-0412 DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,1 15 Defendant. 17 This social security action was submitted to the court without oral argument for ruling on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment.2 Plaintiff’s motion asserts that the Administrative Law Judge erred in several respects, including at step two of the sequential evaluation, in evaluating the medical opinion evidence, in rejecting plaintiff’s testimony, and at step five of the sequential evaluation. //// 24 1 After the filing of this action Kilolo Kijakazi was appointed Acting Commissioner of Social 25 Security and has, therefore, been substituted as the defendant. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (referring to the “Commissioner’s Answer”); 20 C.F.R. § 422.210(d) (“the person holding the Office of the 26 Commissioner shall, in his official capacity, be the proper…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.