Teragawa

(PC) Taylor v. Teragawa

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20232:21-cv-01330California3,805 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIRELL TAYLOR, No. 2:21-cv-01330-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER S. TERAGAWA, Defendant. 16 This matter is before the Court on Defendant S. Teragawa’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 38.) Plaintiff Kirell Taylor (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an opposition. (ECF No. 40.) Defendant filed a reply. (ECF No. 41.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 05, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.