(PC) Howard v. Kern County Lerdo Facility Medical Cheif

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20231:21-cv-00931California816 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILLY HOWARD, Case No. 1:21-cv-00931-JLT-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

DEFENDANT PETERS SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION FOR

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO PROVIDE

KERN COUNTY LERDO FACILITY SUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO MEDICAL CHIEF, et al., EFFECTUATE SERVICE 15 Defendants. 21-DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Billy Howard is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case proceeds against Defendants Ramon Mansilungan, Kendra Lawrence, Kenya Gooden, and Elena Peters for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. I. INTRODUCTION The Court issued its Order Finding Service Appropriate and Forwarding Service Documents to Plaintiff for Completion and Return on June 27, 2023. (Doc. 30.) Plaintiff submitted the completed service documents on July 12, 2023…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.