(PC) Plett v. Religious Committee

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20232:23-cv-00683California390 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIKEL PLETT, Case No. 2:23-cv-00683-DJC-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS RELIGIOUS COMMITTEE, Defendant. 16 On May 23, 2023, I screened plaintiff’s complaint and notified plaintiff that it did not state cognizable claims. ECF No. 8. I granted him thirty days to file either an amended complaint or an advisement indicating his intent to stand by his current complaint, subject to a recommendation of dismissal. Plaintiff had not responded by the deadline, thus, on August 8, 2023, I ordered him to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed. ECF No. 11. I warned him that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 2. The deadline has passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded. Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that: 1. This action be dismissed without prejudice for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.