(PS) Decker v. Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20232:22-cv-00258California554 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREW DECKER, No. 2:22-CV-0258-DAD-DMC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SHANNAH JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. On July 31, 2023, the Court issued an order determining that service of the complaint is appropriate. That order required Plaintiff to submit to the United States Marshal, within 15 days of the date of service of the order, a completed summons and copies of the complaint, and file a statement with the Court within 20 days that said documents have been submitted. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. More than 20 days have elapsed and Plaintiff has not complied. The Court must weigh five factors before imposing the harsh sanction of dismissal. See Bautista v. Los Angeles…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.