Pompa

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, No. 2:22-CV-0023-WBS-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M. POMPA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Judgment has been entered. Pending before the court in this closed case is plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel, an interpreter, and to reopen the case. (Docket No. 27.) The court construes this motion as seeking, among other things, reconsideration of the final judgment entered in this case. The court may grant reconsideration under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) and 60. Generally, a motion for reconsideration of a final judgment is appropriately brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). See Backlund v. Barnhart, 778 F.2d 1386, 1388 (9th Cir. 1985) (discussing reconsideration of summary judgment); see also Schroeder v. McDonald, 55 F.3d 454, 458-59 (9th Cir. 1995). The…