(PC) McCraven v. Solano County Justice Center

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20232:23-cv-01012California395 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESSICA MARIE McCRAVEN, Case No. 2:23-cv-01012-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER SOLANO COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On August 1, 2023, I screened plaintiff’s complaint and notified her that the complaint did 18 not state cognizable claims. ECF No. 5. I granted her thirty days to file an amended complaint or 19 an advisement indicating her intent to stand by her current complaint, subject to a 20 recommendation that it be dismissed. To date, plaintiff has not responded. 21 To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. 22 The court may impose sanctions, including dismissing a case, for failure to comply with its orders 23 or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. 24 Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 25 1988). Involuntary dismissal is a harsh penalty, but a district court has a duty to administer 26 justice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.