(PC) Chavez v. Kings County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20231:20-cv-00503California829 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PABLO CHAVEZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-00503-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S FED. R.

CIV. P. 60 MOTION

v. (Doc. 16) KINGS COUNTY, KINGS COUNTY JAIL, SHRIEBER, Classification Officer, and PITNUM, Classification Officer, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Pablo Chavez, a former state prisoner appearing pro se, initiated this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 1, “Complaint.”) On August 29, 2023, Plaintiff filed a “Motion to Rule 60” which the Court construes as a motion to reopen this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60. (Doc. 16.) BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this case on April 8, 2020, by filing a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 1.) On July 27, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued a screening order finding the Complaint failed to state a cognizable. (Doc. 12.) Within twenty-one days of service of the screening order, Plaintiff was directed to (1)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.