(SS) Alawad v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANAAHMAD ALAWAD, No. 2:22-cv-0931 DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 17 This social security action was submitted to the Court without oral argument for ruling on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment.1 Plaintiff’s motion argues that the Administrative Law Judge’s step three analysis and residual functional capacity determination were erroneous. For the reasons explained below, plaintiff’s motion is granted, the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) is reversed, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings. //// //// 27 1 Both parties have previously consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action 28 PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On March 30, 2020, plaintiff filed an application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of…