Robinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID ROBINSON, No. 2:23-cv-914-MCE-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF No. 13.) R&M RASHIDY INVESTMENT, INC., Defendant. 16 On Friday, September 15, 2023, defendant filed an ex parte motion for Rule 34 discovery restraining order, docketing this motion as a motion for temporary restraining order. According to defendant’s submission and associated documents, it appears plaintiff intends to conduct a Rule 34 inspection of defendant’s business on Tuesday, September 19th as related to plaintiff’s ADA claims. (ECF No. 13.) Currently pending on the docket is defendant’s motion for a protective order regarding this inspection, as the parties dispute the scope of the area subject to inspection. This matter is set for a hearing on October 10, 2023. (See ECF No. 8.) First, the court is not convinced that TROs apply to discovery matters. See, e.g., United States v. INSYS Therapeutics, Inc., 2021 WL 6882168, at *1 (C.D.…