(SS) Naibkhyl v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 20232:22-cv-01368California4,307 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KHALEDA NAIBKHYL, No. 2:22-cv-01368 AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act (“the Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-34. For the reasons that follow, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment will be GRANTED, and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment will be DENIED. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff applied for DIB on May 15, 2018. Administrative Record (“AR”) 159. The disability onset date was alleged to be November 5, 2013. AR 178. The application was 26 DIB is paid to disabled persons who have contributed to the Disability Insurance Program, and who suffer from a mental or physical disability. 42 U.S.C. § 423(a)(1); Bowen v. City of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.