Covello

(PC) Rodriguez v. Covello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 20232:22-cv-00602California506 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN MICHAEL RODRIGUEZ, Case No. 2:22-cv-00602-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER; FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

PATRICK COVELLO, et al.¸ Defendants. 16 On December 5, 2022, I screened plaintiff’s amended complaint and notified him that, while some of his claims were cognizable, he could not proceed with all of his claims in the same action. ECF No. 18. I granted him thirty days to file an amended complaint or an advisement indicating his intent to stand by his current complaint, subject to a recommendation that claims and parties be dismissed. On March 7, 2023, I granted plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 20. On May 22, 2023, plaintiff filed a request for status, so I directed the Clerk’s Office to re-serve on plaintiff both the December 5 screening order and the March 7 order granting him additional time to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff did not respond within thirty days of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.