Mayfield

(PC) Ramos v. Mayfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 20231:21-cv-01036California1,118 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEOBARDO ERIC RAMOS, No. 1:21-cv-01036-ADA-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

MAYFIELD, (ECF Nos. 123, 125, 129) Defendant. 16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Leobardo Eric Ramos’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge’s order denying Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of expert witnesses. (ECF No. 125.) For the reasons stated below, the Court denies Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration. I. Background Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is proceeding on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against Defendant Mayfield. (See ECF Nos. 12, 21, 109, 140.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 20, 2023, Plaintiff filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.