(PC) Smith v. Municipality of Fresno County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 20232:21-cv-01992California1,184 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARY PAUL SMITH, No. 2:21-cv-1992 DJC AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MUNICIPALITY OF FRESNO COUNTY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Dispositive motions are before the court. See ECF Nos. 135, 144 (parties’ motions for summary judgment). Recently, however, several orders issued by the court and sent to plaintiff have been returned as undeliverable. For the reasons stated below, plaintiff will be given a single opportunity to file a change of address form with this court. In addition, given the circumstances, plaintiff will also be given a final opportunity to file a non-prisoner application with the court as well as a proper response to defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Finally, the Clerk of Court will be directed to send a 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.