(PS) Bisi v. Chase Bank (USA) N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20232:23-cv-01994California1,390 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY J. BISI; and LAURIE D. BISI, No. 2:23-cv-01994-TLN-KJN Plaintiffs, v. ORDER CHASE BANK (USA) N.A.; and LAND

ROVER FINANCIAL GROUP,

15 Defendants.

17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Gregory J. Bisi and Laurie D. Bisi’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Ex Parte Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”). (ECF No. 11.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This matter involves the potential foreclosure sale of Plaintiffs’ property located at 2801 Huntington Road, Sacramento, California 95864 (“Subject Property’) and seizure of Plaintiffs’ 2018 Land Range Rover, VIN SALGS2SV9JA384703 (“Subject Vehicle”). On August 22, 2023, Defendant Chase Bank (USA) N.A., sent Plaintiffs “Notice of Intent to Foreclose” for the Subject Property. (ECF No. 1 at 4.) However, nowhere in Plaintiffs’ Complaint do…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.