(PS) Valdivia v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20232:22-cv-01643California2,801 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIGUEL MARQUEZ VALDIVIA, Plaintiff, No. 2:22-cv-1643 KJM DB PS v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al. Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, Miguel Marquez Valdivia, is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the undersigned is defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 15.) For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion to dismiss will be granted and plaintiff will be granted leave to file an amended complaint. BACKGROUND Plaintiff proceeding pro se commenced this action on September 19, 2022, by filing a complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) The complaint alleges that the defendants failed to address plaintiff’s serious medical needs while plaintiff was incarcerated at the Sacramento County…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.