Hearn

Hearn v. City of Bakersfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 20231:22-cv-00668California917 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MATTHEW ALAN HEARN, Case No. 1:22-cv-00668-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO PAY

SANCTIONS OF $100 PER DAY

v. (Doc. 45) CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al.

Defendants. 16 On December 14, 2021, Plaintiff Matthew Alan Hearn (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action in Superior Court of the State of California, County of Kern. (Doc. 1). Defendants removed this action to this Court on June 2, 2022. Id. On March 8, 2023, the Court issued a scheduling order that, among other things, set a mid- discovery status conference for September 21, 2023, and required the parties to file a joint status report no later than one week before the conference. (Doc. 42). On September 14, 2023, the date the joint status report was due, Defendants filed a status report. (Doc. 44). In that report, counsel for Defendants noted he attempted to confer with Plaintiff regarding a draft report but received no response. Id. On September 15, 2023, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.