CDCR

(PC) Springfield v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20232:23-cv-00594California1,001 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CIRON B. SPRINGFIELD, Case No. 2:23-cv-00594-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER v. CDCR, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff brings this section 1983 case against defendants alleging that they violated his rights by failing to provide him with adequate dental care and by falsifying medical documents that impacted his medical access and custody classification. ECF No. 1 at 13. His allegations against defendants Tan and Williams for failing to provide him with adequate medical care are suitable to proceed. His other claims, for the reasons state below, are not. Plaintiff may either proceed only with his cognizable claims, or delay serving any defendant and file an amended complaint. I will also grant his application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 4. 28 Screening Order I. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that seeks relief against a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.