Amps

Amps v. Magsig

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20231:23-cv-01255California1,104 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRAVARIS AMPS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01255-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION

v. FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

COURT ORDER FAILURE TO

MATHON MAGSIG, PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO PAY

FILING FEE

Defendant. (ECF No. 2)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

18 Travaris Amps (“Plaintiff”), who is proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action on August 22, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee and did not submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. On August 23, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiff to either submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis or to pay the filing fee, within twenty- one (21) days of entry of the order. (ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff has not filed an application nor paid the filing fee by the deadline to do so. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.