Singh

Singh v. United States Department of Homeland Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20231:23-cv-00680California462 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HANMEET SINGH, Case No. 1:23-CV-00680-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO CLOSE

v. CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET TO

REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 9) 16 Plaintiff Hanmeet Singh initiated this immigration action against Defendants United States Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, and Emilia Bardini (collectively, “Defendants”) on May 3, 2023, claiming that U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) has unreasonably delayed scheduling an interview on his pending asylum application. (ECF No. 1.) Defendants were served on May 22, 2023, and have not yet responded to the complaint. (See ECF No. 6.) On June 9, 2023, the parties filed a stipulated request to hold…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.