(PC) Spears v. El Dorado County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20232:15-cv-00165California951 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN SPEARS, No. 2:15-cv-0165 MCE AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

EL DORADO COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has moved for modification of the discovery and scheduling order. ECF No. 103. Defendants Handy, Garcia, and El Dorado County have filed an opposition to the motion (ECF No. 108), to which plaintiff has replied (ECF No. 110). For the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s motion will be denied, and discovery will remain closed. In addition, it will be recommended that defendant Armstrong be dismissed. I. MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER The discovery and scheduling order in this case has already been modified three times, twice on plaintiff’s motion. See ECF Nos. 76, 100; see also ECF No. 78. The last modification order specified that all discovery must be completed and any motions to compel must be filed no later than June 5, 2023, and that no further…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.