(PC) James v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20232:21-cv-00713California1,350 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD EUGENE JAMES, Case No. 2:21-cv-00713-DJC-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff brings this section 1983 case against the city and county of Sacramento and Thebeau and LeRose, two detectives employed by the Sacramento Police Department. ECF No. 35 at 2. He alleges that defendant Thebeau arrested him in Kansas without a valid warrant and transported him back to California to face criminal charges, and that he did so at the behest of the 25 26 1In my last order, I advised plaintiff that, if he declined to file a new amended complaint, I would screen the latter of his most recent complaints. ECF No. 37. He has not filed a new amended complaint, and this action now proceeds on the complaint at ECF No. 35. 28 city and county. Id. at 4. He claims that, during transport, Thebeau refused to allow him to use the bathroom, and he urinated on himself. Id. at 5-6. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.