Lockwood

(PC) Rood v. Lockwood

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20232:20-cv-00271California9,902 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLTON JAMES ROOD, No. 2:20-cv-0271 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

ISAAC LOCKWOOD, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former county and current state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 63. I. Procedural History This case proceeds on plaintiff’s first amended complaint. ECF No. 11. On screening, the court found that plaintiff had stated cognizable claims for excessive force against defendants Lockwood, Vangerwen, Hurte, and Jurkiewicz; deliberate indifference against Lockwood and Vangerwen; retaliation against Lockwood, Hurte, and Jurkiewicz; and unconstitutional conditions of confinement against Vangerwen. ECF No. 17. No other claims were sufficiently pled. Id. Plaintiff was given the option of proceeding on the first amended complaint as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.