Castellanos

(PC) Gibson v. Castellanos

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 20231:21-cv-00794California791 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REGINALD GIBSON, 1:21-cv-00794-ADA-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT

vs. C. RILEY BE DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION UNDER RULE 4(m) CASTELLANOS, et al., (ECF No. 26.) Defendants.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE ON OR

BEFORE OCTOBER 13, 2023

21 I. BACKGROUND Reginald Gibson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 30, 2023, the United States Marshal (“Marshal”) filed a return of service unexecuted, indicating the Marshal was unable to locate Defendant C. Riley for service of process. (ECF No. 26.) On September 9, 2023, the Court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to respond in writing by September 29, 2023, showing cause why Defendant C. Riley should not be dismissed from this action for Plaintiff’s failure to provide sufficient…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.