Ankintola

(PC) Foust v. Ankintola

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 20232:23-cv-01208California704 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARL FOUST, No. 2:23-cv-1208 AC P Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. OMONIYI TEMITOPE ANKINTOLA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed June 27, 2023, plaintiff was directed to file a completed in forma pauperis application or pay the filing fee and to submit a signed complaint. ECF No. 3. He was cautioned that failure to comply with either directive would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 2. After the time for compliance passed, the court noted that plaintiff had filed only an unsigned first amended complaint; plaintiff was given another opportunity to file a signed complaint and to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the fee. ECF No. 6. He was cautioned that failure to comply with either part of the order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without further warning. Id. The time to comply with that order has now passed, and though plaintiff has filed two motions for leave to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.