(PC) Khademi v. Legislation of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVOOD KHADEMI, No. 2:23-cv-1861 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

LEGISLATION OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se. ECF No. 1. He seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and other federal law. Id. at 1. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee nor submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The undersigned will not direct plaintiff to submit an IFP application because, for the reasons stated below, plaintiff qualifies as a three-strikes litigant within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Accordingly, it will be recommended that plaintiff be ordered to pay the filing fee in full prior to proceeding any further with this action. I. THREE STRIKES RULE: 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) 28 U.S.C. §…