Shen
(PC) Uhuru v. Shen
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Kohen Diallo E. Uhuru, No. 2:23-cv-00068-KJM-AC Plaintiff, ORDER v. Haniel Shen, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 On June 21, 2023, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and plaintiff be 19 ordered to file the filing fee prior to any further proceedings in this action. F. & R. at 4, ECF No.9. The magistrate judge found plaintiff is a three-strikes litigant within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and the imminent danger exception did not apply. /d. Plaintiff filed 22 objections, Objs., ECF No. 10, and this court adopted the findings and recommendations in full 23 and denied plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Prior Order, ECF No. 13. Plaintiff now moves the court to reconsider its prior order and, in the alternative, requests an extension of 25 time to pay the filing fee from 30 days…