Paca

Washington v. Paca

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20231:23-cv-00673California564 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PERRY KENJI WASHINGTON, Case No. 1:23-cv-00673-JLT-SKO

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

v. A RC ECTI OO MN M S EH NO DU EL DD FN OO RT DB IE S MISSAL 12 (Doc. 7) MARY L. PACA, et al.,

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

Defendants.

15 _____________________________________/ 16 17 On May 2, 2023, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed the complaint in this action. (Docs. 1, 2.) On August 17, 2023, the Court issued an order finding that Plaintiff’s complaint failed to state any cognizable claims, and granting leave for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint or state that he stands on his complaint within thirty days. (Doc. 7.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, a statement indicating he stands on his complaint, or requested an extension of time in which to do so. (See Docket.) The Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, corresponding with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.