Trujillo

Trujillo v. Chaudhary

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20231:22-cv-00969California5,491 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE TRUJILLO, Case No. 1:22-cv-00969-ADA-SKO 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE GRANTED

v. IN PART

(Doc. 20) HARBIR CHAUDHARY, individually and dba 99 Food Market & Gasoline, et al., OBJECTIONS DUE: 21 DAYS Defendants.

_________________________________ ___/

18 On August 7, 2023, Plaintiff Jose Trujillo (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion for default judgment against Defendants Harbir Chaudhary and Ved Vati Chaudhary (aka Ved Vati Rana), both individually and doing business as 99 Food Market & Gasoline (“Defendants”), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b) (the “Motion”). (Doc. 20). No opposition to the Motion was filed. (See Docket.) The Motion is therefore deemed unopposed. The hearing set for September 20, 2023, on the Motion was vacated and the matter was taken under submission. (Doc. 21.) For the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.