Bragg

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Jimmie Stephens, No. 2:23-cev-01172-KJM-AC Plaintiff, ORDER v. L. Bragg, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 On June 27, 2023, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that 19 plaintiff be ordered to pay the filing fee prior to any further proceedings in this action. F. & R. at 5, ECF No. 6. The magistrate judge concluded plaintiff is a three-strikes litigant within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Jd. This court adopted the findings and recommendations in 22 full and denied plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Prior Order at 2, ECF No. 13. 23 Plaintiff now objects to this court’s order. Objs., ECF No. 14. Plaintiff argues his prior actions 24 should not have counted as “strikes.” See generally id. The court construes the objections as a motion for reconsideration and…