Ariza

(HC) Haapaniemi v. Ariza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20231:23-cv-00635California383 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BJORN ERIK HAAPANIEMI, Case No. 1:23-cv-00635-SAB-HC

Petitioner, ORDER FOR PETITIONER TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY PETITION SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO OBEY

COURT ORDER AND PAY FILING FEE

ARIZA,

Respondent.

16 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On July 25, 2023, this Court vacated Petitioner’s in forma pauperis status and ordered that within thirty days of the date of service of the order, Petitioner was to pay the $5.00 filing fee. (ECF No. 7.) To date, Petitioner has not paid the filing fee or otherwise informed the Court that he continues to encounter difficulties at his institution with respect to effecting payment of the filing fee. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.