(SS)Fryar

(SS)Fryar v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20231:21-cv-00918California9,246 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES BINGLEY FRYAR, Case No. 1:21-cv-00918-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER REMANDING ACTION FOR

FURTHER PROCEEDINGS UNDER

v. SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL (Docs. 17-19)

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 17 Charles Bingley Fryar (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his application for disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. (Doc. No. 1). The matter is currently before the Court on the certified administrative record (Doc. 10) and the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument. (Docs. 17-19). Plaintiff asserts the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred in the evaluation of his pain testimony and failed to consider a closed period of disability benefits. (Doc. 17 at 31-39). Plaintiff requests the decision of the Commissioner be vacated and the case be remanded for further…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.